Skip to main content
Glama
SetLuca

SetLuca

Official

Reject a knowledge suggestion

luca_knowledge_reject_suggestion
DestructiveIdempotent

Reject a profile suggestion so it stops being offered. The profile is left as it stands.

Instructions

Reject a profile suggestion so it stops being offered. The profile is left as it stands.

Luca operation: POST /api/knowledge/suggestions/{id}/reject Required scopes: knowledge:write Required OAuth scope: luca:queue_ops; data sensitivity: redacted Requires Idempotency-Key. Provide idempotencyKey for safe retries, or the server will generate one. Use workspaceId or workspaceSlug to override the default workspace configured by environment.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "luca_knowledge_reject_suggestion"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
workspaceIdNoOptional Luca workspace id override.
workspaceSlugNoOptional Luca workspace slug override.
idempotencyKeyNoStable key for safe retries. If omitted, the MCP server generates a unique key for this call.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.4.1
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / properties / suggestion / properties / currentValue / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "boolean"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / result / properties / suggestion / properties / suggestedValue / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "boolean"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observedv0.4.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the description is not obligated to restate safety. It nonetheless adds real value: that the profile is preserved, the required scopes (knowledge:write, luca:queue_ops), data sensitivity redaction, and the Idempotency-Key requirement with server-side fallback.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and invariant are front-loaded in the first two sentences, followed by structured metadata lines. Slight redundancy between 'Required scopes' and 'Required OAuth scope' lines, but overall tight and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be described, and the description covers scope, idempotency, and workspace targeting. Minor gap: no mention of behavior when the suggestion is already rejected or the id is unknown.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75% and the description compensates for the remaining gap by explaining that workspaceId/workspaceSlug override the environment default and that idempotencyKey enables safe retries. Only the uuid 'id' parameter is left to the schema, which handles it clearly with format and pattern.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Reject a profile suggestion') plus the outcome ('stops being offered') and the invariant that the profile itself is unchanged. It is distinguishable from the sibling list tool luca_knowledge_suggestions, though it never names an alternative reject/dismiss path explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies when to use it via the effect ('so it stops being offered'), and the closing lines explain workspace override and idempotency-key usage. However, there is no explicit statement of when NOT to use it or how it differs from adjacent tools such as luca_learning_proposals_dismiss or luca_knowledge_sources_disconnect.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools