generate_jenkins_pipeline

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description only states the action without behavioral traits like side effects (e.g., file overwriting), prerequisites (e.g., recorded session must exist), or idempotency. The phrase 'for running the recorded test session' hints at an input dependency but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single 15-word sentence that is front-loaded with the main action and outcome. No unnecessary text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity (2 optional params), no output schema, and sibling tools covering other generators, the description is mostly complete. It lacks explicit prerequisites and output format details, but the core purpose is clear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It partially explains the language enum by listing the build tools in the narrative, but java_version is completely unexplained. This leaves a gap for the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Generate' with clear output 'declarative Jenkinsfile' and context 'recorded test session (Maven, Gradle, or pytest)'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like generate_github_actions or generate_java_junit5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the output type (Jenkinsfile) and sibling context, but no explicit guidance on when to use vs. alternatives, nor when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.