Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Seleniumboot MCP

Seleniumboot MCP

by seleniumboot
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Seleniumboot MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Selenium MCP Server

      PhungXuanAnh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for web automation using Selenium WebDriver, enabling AI assistants to navigate, interact with elements, take screenshots, and manage browser storage.
      10
      MIT

    • Selenium MCP Server

      nayakprashant
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Selenium WebDriver as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLMs to control real browsers for automation tasks like navigation, element interaction, and screenshot capture.
      22
      3
      MIT

    • se-mcp

      se-cli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for se-cli that exposes 50+ Selenium browser automation tools for AI agents, enabling browser control through a thin wrapper around se-cli.
      13 npm
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: navigation, element interaction, assertions, alerts, frames, and code generation are well separated. There is minor overlap among visibility-related tools like is_displayed, wait_for_element, assert_element_visible, and assert_element_not_visible, but descriptions make the intended use distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set is consistently snake_case and mostly follows verb_noun conventions such as get_page_title, wait_for_element, and assert_element_visible. Minor deviations exist with single-verb names like click, hover, refresh, generate, and migrate, but the overall pattern remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 43 tools, the surface is very large for a browser automation server and exceeds the threshold where tool selection becomes costly. Many operations are granular and useful, but the count is high enough that the set feels heavier than necessary for its apparent scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers core browser automation, assertions, alerts, frames, file upload, JavaScript execution, form filling, session logging, and test/code generation. Minor gaps remain around window/tab switching, cookie management, drag-and-drop, and richer wait conditions, but most workflows are fully supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessOutdated data

    Resources