Skip to main content
Glama
seleniumboot

Seleniumboot MCP

by seleniumboot
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Seleniumboot MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Selenium MCP Server

      PhungXuanAnh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for web automation using Selenium WebDriver, enabling AI assistants to navigate, interact with elements, take screenshots, and manage browser storage.
      11
      MIT

    • Selenium MCP Server

      nayakprashant
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes Selenium WebDriver as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLMs to control real browsers for automation tasks like navigation, element interaction, and screenshot capture.
      22
      3
      MIT

    • se-mcp

      se-cli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for se-cli that exposes 50+ Selenium browser automation tools for AI agents, enabling browser control through a thin wrapper around se-cli.
      13 npm
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 85 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between clear_field and type_text (both affect input fields), and between navigate and get_current_url (navigation actions). However, descriptions are sufficiently detailed to differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., accept_alert, assert_element_visible, generate_java_junit5). No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 85 tools, the count is high but may be justified by the broad scope of web testing and code generation. However, it verges on overwhelming, and a more streamlined set could reduce cognitive load.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of testing needs: navigation, element interaction, assertions, cookies, storage, screenshots, shadow DOM, iframes, alerts, network mocking, device emulation, accessibility checks, and code generation for multiple languages and CI/CD pipelines. No obvious gaps for testing automation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources