get_center_closures

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. 'Return locally stored' hints at a read-only operation but does not explicitly state safety, nor does it mention if data might be stale or require refresh. It lacks detail about potential side effects or limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that fully conveys the core functionality without any filler. It is front-loaded with the action (Return) and the object (closure dates), making it easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description adequately explains its purpose. Given the simplicity, it does not need to elaborate on return structure or additional context. However, it could benefit from a brief note on when to use this vs. other closure-related tools, but within the simplicity, it's complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parametersr, so the schema provides minimal information. The description adds the key semantic that the data is center-specific and locally stored, which clarifies why no parameters are needed. This is appropriate and adds value beyond the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool returns center-specific closure dates. It implies a read operation on locally stored data, which distinguishes it from sibling tools that add/remove closures or manage other center settings. However, it lacks a specific verb like 'get all' or 'list', but the purpose is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides minimal guidance on when to use this tool. It does not compare with alternatives like add_center_closure or remove_center_closure, nor does it explain whether it's for viewing vs. modifying closures. No when-not-to-use or context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.