clear_schedule_slot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses a key trait: the clearing is not persisted until save_schedule is called, which is important behavior. It doesn't cover other side effects, auth, or error handling, but given no annotations, it provides reasonable transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no redundant information, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core action and the critical context of the dirty workspace and saving behavior, which is sufficient for a simple clear operation. It omits return details, but no output schema exists to require explanation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain the parameters (date, dayOfWeek, startTime, scheduleType) beyond implying they identify the slot. The schema provides enums for some but no semantic meaning is added.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action (clear a schedule slot) on a specific resource (schedule slot) and distinguishes it from siblings by mentioning the 'dirty workspace' context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description hints at usage in the 'dirty workspace' and that saving is deferred, but it does not explicitly state when to choose this tool over alternatives like set_schedule_slot or when the dirty workspace applies.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.