Skip to main content
Glama
sebit-provider

pilates_mcp

by sebit-provider
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to pilates_mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Invoice Maker

      amyvarga
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server for creating PDF invoices from SQLite data, supporting client management and invoice generation.
      -

    • Alfred

      ndunl075
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first open-source MCP server that acts as a personal secretary, memory manager, and automation hub—it syncs Calendar, Gmail, Canvas, GitHub, and Health into a typed temporal memory graph, and enables approval-gated write actions like creating events, drafting/sending mail, and filing issues, all with telegram/slack/CLI interfaces and a SQLite-backed audit trail.
      33
      Apache 2.0

    • Noted

      fabriziosalmi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local Markdown/HTML note-taking app with built-in MCP server, agentic workflow runtime engine, wikilinks, and state-machine approval gates.
      25 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to distinct resource-action pairs, and the descriptions generally make boundaries clear. The closest potential confusions are create_schedule_poster vs. create_poster and inspect_schedule_file vs. import_schedule_file, but each has enough distinction to guide selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names consistently follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as get_schedule, update_center_profile, render_poster, and validate_schedule. There are no mixed naming conventions or vague one-word tool names.

    Tool Count2/5

    29 tools is above the comfortable range for a single MCP server and crosses the 'too many' threshold. While the tools are organized into settings, schedule, and poster workflows, the large surface increases selection burden and makes the server feel heavy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers center profile settings, schedule import/template/validation/save/export, and poster creation/archive/render/feedback/search comprehensively. Minor lifecycle gaps exist, such as no explicit delete operation for a poster or an entire saved schedule template, but these are workaroundable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources