Skip to main content
Glama
seanshin0214

Dr. QuantMaster MCP Server

by seanshin0214

interpret_test

Interpret statistical test results by analyzing p-values, test statistics, degrees of freedom, and context to determine significance and practical implications for research.

Instructions

통계 검정 결과 해석

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
test_nameYes검정명
statisticNo검정통계량
p_valueYesp-value
dfNo자유도
contextNo맥락

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function for 'interpret_test' tool. It takes input arguments like test_name, p_value, statistic, and returns a structured interpretation, primarily based on whether p-value < 0.05, advising to report effect sizes beyond p-values.
    function handleInterpretTest(args: Record<string, unknown>) {
      const pValue = args.p_value as number;
      return {
        test_name: args.test_name,
        p_value: pValue,
        statistic: args.statistic,
        conclusion: pValue < 0.05 ? "통계적으로 유의함 (p < .05)" : "통계적으로 유의하지 않음 (p ≥ .05)",
        effect_size_note: "p-value 외에 효과크기도 보고 필요"
      };
    }
  • The input schema definition for the 'interpret_test' tool within the exported tools array, specifying properties like test_name, statistic, p_value (required), df, context.
    name: "interpret_test",
    description: "통계 검정 결과 해석",
    inputSchema: {
      type: "object",
      properties: {
        test_name: { type: "string", description: "검정명" },
        statistic: { type: "number", description: "검정통계량" },
        p_value: { type: "number", description: "p-value" },
        df: { type: "number", description: "자유도" },
        context: { type: "string", description: "맥락" },
      },
      required: ["test_name", "p_value"],
    },
  • Registration of the 'interpret_test' tool in the handleToolCall switch statement, mapping the tool name to its handler function handleInterpretTest.
    case "interpret_test":
      return handleInterpretTest(args);
  • The tool object in the exported 'tools' array, registering the name, description, and schema for the MCP tool system.
    name: "interpret_test",
    description: "통계 검정 결과 해석",
    inputSchema: {
      type: "object",
      properties: {
        test_name: { type: "string", description: "검정명" },
        statistic: { type: "number", description: "검정통계량" },
        p_value: { type: "number", description: "p-value" },
        df: { type: "number", description: "자유도" },
        context: { type: "string", description: "맥락" },
      },
      required: ["test_name", "p_value"],
    },
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The description reveals nothing about what the tool actually does beyond the tautological statement - no indication of output format, whether it provides natural language interpretation, statistical guidance, or any behavioral characteristics. For a tool with 5 parameters and no annotations, this is completely inadequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While technically concise (one short phrase), this represents under-specification rather than effective conciseness. The single phrase doesn't earn its place by providing meaningful information. It's too brief to be helpful, failing to communicate essential details about the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, no output schema, and multiple sibling alternatives, the description is completely inadequate. It provides no information about what the tool actually produces, how it differs from other interpretation tools, or what behavioral characteristics users should expect. The description fails to compensate for the lack of structured metadata.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 5 parameters with basic descriptions. The tool description adds no additional parameter information beyond what's in the schema. According to scoring rules, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline is 3 even with no parameter information in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '통계 검정 결과 해석' (interpretation of statistical test results) is a tautology that essentially restates the tool name 'interpret_test'. It doesn't specify what kind of interpretation it provides, what format the output takes, or how it differs from sibling tools like 'interpret_coefficient' or 'interpret_model_fit'. The purpose is vague and lacks differentiation from alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With multiple sibling interpretation tools (interpret_coefficient, interpret_diagnostics, interpret_model_fit), there's no indication of what distinguishes this tool's scope or when it's appropriate versus other options. No context, prerequisites, or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/seanshin0214/quantmaster-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server