search_appointments_by_date

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full behavioral disclosure. It clearly indicates a read operation ('Search') and returns a dictionary. There are no hidden side effects or permissions mentioned, which is acceptable for a simple search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with a heading-like opening line followed by parameter and return documentation. It is reasonably concise, though the parameter descriptions could be more terse (e.g., 'date: Appointment date (YYYY-MM-DD)') without losing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a relatively simple tool with two parameters and a clear search purpose, the description covers the essential aspects: purpose, parameter formats, optional filtering, and return type. The sibling tool list shows this tool's niche, and the description adequately differentiates it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, so the description must compensate. It explains the date parameter format (YYYY-MM-DD) and lists valid status values, adding meaningful context beyond the schema. The description could be slightly more precise about the date format but is adequate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Search for appointments by date', specifying the verb (search), resource (appointments), and scope (by date). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_appointment_by_id (single appointment) and get_patient_appointments (patient-specific).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear usage context: searching appointments by date with an optional status filter. It documents the date format and allowed status values, helping the agent decide when to use this tool. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.