Skip to main content
Glama
sdesani

FHIR MCP Server

by sdesani

get_patient_diagnostic_reports

Retrieve a patient's diagnostic reports, filtered by category, date, or status.

Instructions

Retrieve diagnostic reports for a specific patient.

Args: patient_id: The FHIR patient ID category: Optional filter by category (LAB, RAD, etc.) date: Optional filter by date (YYYY-MM-DD format or date range) status: Optional filter by status (registered, partial, final, corrected)

Returns: Dictionary containing the patient's diagnostic reports

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
patient_idYes
categoryNo
dateNo
statusNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Retrieve' and 'Returns dictionary', but omits side effects, permissions, rate limits, or behavior when no results. No mention of read-only nature or potential pagination.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with bulleted parameter list; no fluff. Purpose is front-loaded. Every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description provides basic parameter info but no return structure details or edge cases. Adequate for simple use but incomplete for complex scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description adds brief semantics for each parameter (e.g., FHIR patient ID, category examples, date format). However, it lacks exhaustive value lists or format details, providing marginal improvement over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves diagnostic reports for a specific patient, with a specific verb and resource. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like get_diagnostic_report_by_id or get_patient_lab_results.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_diagnostic_report_by_id for single report, get_patient_lab_results for lab results). No when-not-to-use advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sdesani/mcp-fhir'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server