get_condition_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states that the tool retrieves a condition and returns a dictionary, but does not mention error handling, permissions, rate limits, or side effects. As a read operation, it's likely safe, but this is not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with only two sentences and a structured docstring. Every part is necessary and contributes to understanding. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and an output schema, so the description is mostly adequate. However, it lacks usage guidelines and behavioral details, which are important for comprehensive understanding. The presence of an output schema reduces the need to describe returns, but other gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds the term 'FHIR Condition ID' to the parameter, providing context beyond the schema's bare type 'string'. However, schema description coverage is 0%, so the description partially compensates but does not specify format or constraints. Baseline is 3 given the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'a specific condition by ID', making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It is distinct from sibling tools like 'get_patient_conditions' which list conditions, and other get_by_id tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_patient_conditions' or other get_by_id tools. There is no mention of prerequisites or context for using the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.