Release a GPU Trace report session

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds explicit detail about what is deleted: 'Temporary artifacts created without output_directory are deleted; user-selected persistent output directories are never deleted.' This goes beyond the destructiveHint annotation by specifying exactly what is destroyed, which is critical for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, every sentence earns its place. No fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple tool with one well-documented parameter, annotations covering safety (destructive, idempotent), and description covering the key behavioral nuance about artifact deletion. This is complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and report_id is well-documented in the schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states a specific verb 'Unregister' with a specific resource 'GPU Trace report', making it clear what the tool does. It is distinguished from siblings by being the only 'release' tool and its scope of managing report sessions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage context is implied but not explicit. The description doesn't mention when to use this tool vs alternatives or provide exclusions, though the destructive nature and artifact handling give some situational context. No alternatives are named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.