Skip to main content
Glama
santoshray02

CSV Editor

by santoshray02

redo

Restore a previously undone change in CSV files to correct mistakes or revert decisions during data editing.

Instructions

Redo a previously undone operation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
session_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The primary handler function for the 'redo' tool, registered via @mcp.tool decorator. It receives the session_id and delegates execution to the internal _redo_operation helper function.
    @mcp.tool
    async def redo(
        session_id: str,
        ctx: Context = None
    ) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Redo a previously undone operation."""
        return await _redo_operation(session_id, ctx)
  • Helper function implementing the core redo logic. Retrieves the session, calls session.redo(), handles errors, and formats the response using OperationResult.
    async def redo_operation(
        session_id: str,
        ctx: Context = None
    ) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """
        Redo a previously undone operation.
        
        Args:
            session_id: Session identifier
            ctx: FastMCP context
            
        Returns:
            Dict with success status and redo result
        """
        try:
            manager = get_session_manager()
            session = manager.get_session(session_id)
            
            if not session:
                return OperationResult(
                    success=False,
                    message="Session not found",
                    error=f"No session with ID: {session_id}"
                ).model_dump()
            
            if ctx:
                await ctx.info(f"Redoing operation for session {session_id}")
            
            result = await session.redo()
            
            if result["success"]:
                if ctx:
                    await ctx.info(f"Successfully redid operation: {result.get('message')}")
                
                return OperationResult(
                    success=True,
                    message=result["message"],
                    session_id=session_id,
                    data=result
                ).model_dump()
            else:
                return OperationResult(
                    success=False,
                    message="Failed to redo operation",
                    error=result.get("error")
                ).model_dump()
                
        except Exception as e:
            logger.error(f"Error redoing operation: {str(e)}")
            if ctx:
                await ctx.error(f"Failed to redo operation: {str(e)}")
            return OperationResult(
                success=False,
                message="Failed to redo operation",
                error=str(e)
            ).model_dump()
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only states the basic action. It doesn't disclose behavioral traits such as whether this modifies data, requires specific permissions, has side effects, or how it interacts with session state. For a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero wasted words. It's front-loaded and directly states the tool's purpose without unnecessary elaboration, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one parameter, an output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimally adequate but lacks depth. It doesn't explain the relationship with 'undo', what constitutes a 'previously undone operation', or the expected output, leaving gaps in contextual understanding despite the output schema covering return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage for its single parameter 'session_id', and the tool description provides no parameter information. However, with only one parameter and an output schema present, the baseline is 3 as the schema defines the input structure, though the description adds no value beyond this.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Redo') and the target ('a previously undone operation'), which is specific and actionable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from its sibling 'undo' or other history-related tools like 'restore_to_operation' or 'clear_history', which would be needed for a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after an 'undo' operation but doesn't specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'restore_to_operation' or clarify prerequisites (e.g., requires an undone operation in session history). No explicit guidance on when-not-to-use or comparisons with siblings is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/santoshray02/csv-editor'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server