configure_auto_save

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only says 'configure' without disclosing effects like whether it triggers an immediate save, persists across sessions, or requires an active session. Behavioral traits are largely opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks necessary detail to be fully self-contained. It is not verbose, but could be structured to include parameter context or usage hints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (10 parameters, output schema, related siblings), the description is incomplete. It does not explain how this tool relates to other auto-save tools, what output to expect, or parameter dependencies.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not clarify any of the 10 parameters (e.g., session_id, enabled, mode). It adds no value beyond the schema itself, leaving agents to guess meanings.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Configure auto-save settings for a session' clearly states the tool's action and resource, and distinguishes it from siblings like disable_auto_save and get_auto_save_status. However, it could be more specific about the scope of configuration (e.g., enabling, mode, strategy).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as disable_auto_save or get_auto_save_status. There is no mention of prerequisites or typical usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.