Skip to main content
Glama
santoshray02

CSV Editor

by santoshray02

health_check

Verify the operational status of the CSV Editor server to ensure it's ready for data processing tasks.

Instructions

Check the health status of the CSV Editor.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler function for the 'health_check' tool. It is decorated with @mcp.tool, which registers it with the FastMCP server. The function performs a health check by retrieving session manager stats and returns a status dictionary.
    @mcp.tool
    async def health_check(ctx: Context) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Check the health status of the CSV Editor."""
        session_manager = get_session_manager()
        
        try:
            active_sessions = len(session_manager.sessions)
            
            if ctx:
                await ctx.info("Health check performed successfully")
            
            return {
                "success": True,
                "status": "healthy",
                "version": "1.0.0",
                "active_sessions": active_sessions,
                "max_sessions": session_manager.max_sessions,
                "session_ttl_minutes": session_manager.ttl_minutes,
            }
        except Exception as e:
            if ctx:
                await ctx.error(f"Health check failed: {str(e)}")
            return {
                "success": False,
                "status": "error",
                "error": str(e)
            }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states what the tool does but doesn't reveal any behavioral traits such as whether it's read-only, has side effects, requires authentication, or includes rate limits. For a health check tool, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose without unnecessary words. It's front-loaded with the core action and resource, making it easy for an agent to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (0 parameters, no annotations) and the presence of an output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context on what 'health status' entails or how it relates to other tools, which could help the agent use it more effectively in a broader workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema fully documents the inputs. The description doesn't need to add parameter semantics, and it appropriately avoids redundancy. A baseline of 4 is given since no parameters exist, and the description doesn't mislead about inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Check') and resource ('health status of the CSV Editor'), making the purpose specific and understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_server_info' or 'get_session_info', which might also provide health-related information, so it falls short of a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites, timing (e.g., after errors or periodically), or how it differs from siblings like 'get_server_info', leaving the agent with no usage context beyond the basic purpose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/santoshray02/csv-editor'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server