ecommerce_settings_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds context about per-language translations and the relationship to product price interpretation, complementing the annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with the main purpose in the first sentence and additional context in the second. It is well-structured and front-loaded, though slightly verbose in listing fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one parameter with no schema description and no output schema, the tool description should explain both input and output. It lists returned fields but omits what 'site' is, leaving a gap despite adequate context on usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'site' has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the tool description does not explain its meaning or expected format. The description lists returned fields but fails to clarify the input parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get ecommerce store settings' with a specific verb and resource, and lists example fields. It is distinct from the sibling 'ecommerce_settings_update' tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly marks the tool as 'Read-only' and explains its role as the source of truth for 'price_entry_mode', helping agents decide when to use it vs. product tools. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.