category_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the REST endpoint (GET) and reinforces the read-only nature. Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, so the description complements these by providing the HTTP method context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with one sentence plus endpoint and read-only flag. Every word is purposeful and no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of a GET operation with two parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks explanation of the 'site' parameter and does not describe the return value. More detail would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only hints at 'by id' for category_id but completely ignores the 'site' parameter. It does not add meaningful semantics beyond the schema's bare types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Get' and resource 'single category by id'. It effectively distinguishes from siblings like categories_list (list all) and category_create/delete/update (write operations).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., categories_list for multiple categories). The context of retrieving a single category by ID is implied, but no when-not-to or alternative tool mentions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.