category_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond annotations by disclosing that Voog does not support description/image_id on categories despite some documentation suggesting otherwise, based on empirical verification. This is a notable behavioral trait not covered by annotations. However, it does not mention permissions or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two sentences plus a note) and front-loads the purpose. Every sentence provides essential information, and the empirical note is valuable without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the key aspects: required/optional, auto-generation, and a known limitation. It does not detail the response structure or error handling, but it's sufficient for an agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (no property descriptions in schema), so the description carries full burden. It explains that name is required, slug is optional and auto-generated if omitted, and parent_id is for sub-categories. This adds meaningful semantics beyond just listing parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with 'Create a category' and includes the HTTP endpoint, making the action and resource clear. It specifies required and optional parameters, and it's distinct from sibling tools like category_update or category_delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes that slug auto-generates if omitted and parent_id is for sub-categories, which provides some context. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus others (e.g., root vs sub-category, or compared to batch creation endpoints).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.