Skip to main content
Glama
rooquiz

RooQuiz

insert_question

Insert a question or page break at a precise position in a form by referencing an existing field code with after/before, enabling targeted placement without rebuilding the form.

Instructions

Insert an item (question or page break) at a specific position. type can be a question type or Breaker. Use after / before to reference an existing field code (from get_form's field.code). To insert at the very front: before references the first field's code. To insert at the end, use add_question. Not idempotent: if the call times out it may still have succeeded, so retrying blindly can create a duplicate — check first, then retry only if it is really missing.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
maxNoNumberField only: maximum allowed input value (must be >= min). Rejected for other question types.
minNoNumberField only: minimum allowed input value (respondents cannot submit a smaller number). Rejected for other question types.
codeNoOptional stable identifier for this question (field code). Omit it to let the server auto-generate one. Set a meaningful code (e.g. "q1") when report.formula or a dimension needs to reference this question, so you can write the formula as `{{q1}}` in the same call instead of round-tripping via get_form. Rules: start with a letter or underscore, then only letters/digits/underscores (no hyphens, spaces, or leading digit), at most 64 chars, and not a reserved math word (e, E, pi, PI, tau, phi, i, Infinity, NaN, true, false, null, undefined). Must be unique among all items in the form.
nameNoQuestion stem text. Allows plain text or restricted HTML (tag allowlist: <p> <strong>/<b> <em>/<i> <u> <s> <mark> <span> <sup> <sub> <br>; other tags are stripped and the text kept).
typeYesQuestion type; Breaker means a page break, no name/choices etc. needed
unitNoNumberField only: display unit suffix shown after the input, e.g. "kg" / "$" / "min". Rejected for other question types.
afterNoInsert after this code; choose either after or before
scoreNoPoints this question is worth, default 0 (not scored). Quiz scene: awarded when the answer matches correctAnswer, and a positive value is required once correctAnswer is set. Scored Quiz scene: pairing it with correctAnswer enables the fallback mode above, but choices[i].score is more flexible. Rejected in the outcome_quiz scene, for DateField / TimeField / Rate, and — in the scored_quiz scene — for NumberField (where the submitted number itself is the score) and FillBlank (collected only, never scored).
stepsNoRate only: number of rating steps, i.e. the highest rating (3-10, default 5). In the scored_quiz scene the submitted rating value (1..steps) is the question score, unless a per-star score is configured in the web app. Rejected for other question types.
wordsNoRate only: optional scale labels evenly distributed under the rating control, e.g. ["Poor", "Excellent"] for the two endpoints (up to 5 labels). Rejected for other question types.
beforeNoInsert before this code; choose either after or before
formIdYesThe form ID to insert the item into
aiMatchNoOnly for FillBlank in the knowledge_quiz scene. Enables AI grading: the AI compares the respondent answer against correctAnswer and scores by accuracy, instead of requiring an exact string match. Requires correctAnswer (the standard answer) and score > 0 (the score earned when accuracy reaches the threshold). Pass an empty object {} to enable with default settings; omit for plain exact-match grading.
choicesNoChoice-based questions only (SingleCheck / MultiCheck / DropDown / Ordering / Cascade), where it is required; ignored for every other type, including TrueFalse — its two options come from trueLabel / falseLabel. Per-type limits: SingleCheck / MultiCheck 2-20 items — for a longer list use DropDown (2-100 items) instead; Ordering 2-10 items; Cascade nests via choices[i].children (up to 3 levels, at most 100 nodes in total). IMPORTANT (knowledge_quiz scene): vary the position of the correct option(s) across questions — do NOT always place the correct answer first. Distribute correct answers roughly evenly over all positions so they are not predictable.
explainNoOptional answer explanation. The frontend renders it in the question's "answer explanation" field (DescriptionEditor); the rich-text rules are identical to description. Do not stuff the answer explanation into description — that is the question's supplementary note and will not be shown as an explanation to respondents/graders.
shuffleNoOrdering only: shuffle the displayed choice order for each respondent. Defaults to true for MCP-created questions — the stored choices order would otherwise leak the correct order when correctAnswer matches it. Pass false only when the initial order is intentionally meaningful. Rejected for other question types.
multipleNoDropDown only: allow selecting multiple options (default false = single select). Affects the quiz-scene correctAnswer shape: an array of labels/codes when true, a single one when false. Rejected for other question types (SingleCheck/MultiCheck are inherently single/multi).
requiredNoWhether the question is required, default false
precisionNoDateField / TimeField only: picker precision. DateField accepts year | month | day | hour | minute | second (default day; e.g. "month" shows a year-month picker, "second" a full datetime picker). TimeField accepts only minute | second (default minute). Ignored for other question types.
trueLabelNoTrueFalse only: custom display text for the "true" option (e.g. "Yes" / "Agree"). Ignored for other question types. Leave empty to fall back to the built-in default for the form language ("Correct" in English forms). Does not change the stored answer value, which stays "true".
falseLabelNoTrueFalse only: custom display text for the "false" option (e.g. "No" / "Disagree"). Ignored for other question types. Leave empty to fall back to the built-in default for the form language ("Incorrect" in English forms). Does not change the stored answer value, which stays "false".
descriptionNoOptional supplementary note for the question. Allows a wider HTML subset: everything the stem allows + <h1>-<h6> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <a href> <img src> <hr> <art-field> (variable placeholder, data-type / data-cid); unsafe protocols (javascript:/data:) and unknown attributes are stripped. This field also accepts an inline image: put an <img src="..."> in it, where src is a direct image URL that renders in <img src> (a page URL that merely contains an image does not work). Use finalize_image_upload to host an image yourself, or a direct URL the user supplied. Never invent an image URL — omit the image instead of risking a broken one.
trueOutcomesNoOutcome scene + TrueFalse only (required there together with falseOutcomes): the outcome codes that answering "true" votes for. Use [] for a side that votes for nothing. Rejected for other question types / scenes.
correctAnswerNoThe "correct answer" of the knowledge_quiz scene; setting it makes the question scored, so pair it with a positive `score`. The shape follows the question type — see the anyOf branches; a choice is referenced by its label or its code, so reference it by code whenever the same label appears more than once (Ordering rejects an ambiguous label outright). Required on SingleCheck / MultiCheck / DropDown / Ordering in the knowledge_quiz scene, optional on FillBlank / NumberField there. NumberField answers must be typeable within min / max and decimalPlaces. Rejected for DateField / TimeField / Rate (data-collection and rating fields; configure date/time scoring in the web app), rejected for FillBlank in the scored_quiz scene (free text is collected only there), and rejected in the outcome_quiz scene (no right or wrong answers there). In the scored_quiz scene prefer choices[i].score per option; passing correctAnswer + score there only falls back to "the matching choice gets score, others get 0".
decimalPlacesNoNumberField only: how many decimal places respondents may enter (stored as the field's numeric precision), default 0 = integers only. Rejected for other question types. Note this is different from the string `precision` of DateField / TimeField.
falseOutcomesNoOutcome scene + TrueFalse only (required there together with trueOutcomes): the outcome codes that answering "false" votes for. Use [] for a side that votes for nothing. Rejected for other question types / scenes.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fieldNoThe created question, including its generated code
formIdNoThe form that was edited
positionNo0-based index the question landed at
itemCountNoQuestion / page-break count after the insert

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations are all false/neutral (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false), so the description carries the burden and delivers: it discloses that the call is not idempotent, that a timeout may still mean success, that blind retries can duplicate items, and prescribes a check-then-retry strategy. This is exactly the kind of non-obvious behavioral trait an agent needs. It stops short of a 5 only because it doesn't touch on post-success effects or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, zero filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, followed by the positioning mechanics, the sibling route for the end case, and the idempotency warning. Every sentence carries load and the most critical operational caveat (retry behavior) is placed last where the risk context has been built.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is complex (26 params, nested choices/aiMatch) but the schema is exceptionally rich — every parameter documented and a long FIELD APPLICABILITY note covers per-type/per-scene rules — so the description need not restate parameters. It supplies exactly the missing operational layer: positioning semantics, the get_form reference mechanism, end-case routing, and retry policy. An output schema exists, so return values need no explanation. A 5 would require something additional the agent still needs that isn't covered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the schema already documents every parameter thoroughly. The description adds genuine value on top for the positional parameters: after/before values come from get_form's field.code, and 'before the first field's code' is the front-insertion trick — detail the schema's terse 'Insert after this code; choose either after or before' does not convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb+resource+scope: 'Insert an item (question or page break) at a specific position.' It immediately distinguishes itself from the sibling add_question by scoping to positional insertion (front/middle) versus appending, so an agent can tell them apart without reading either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly names the alternative and the selecting condition: 'To insert at the end, use add_question.' It also gives the mechanical recipe — reference existing field codes from get_form's field.code via after/before, and use before on the first field's code for front insertion. No inference is required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rooquiz/rooquiz-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server