A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceQuiz Generator AI - MCP server providing AI-powered tools and automation by MEOK AI Labs
6 npm
92 PyPI
MIT
RooQuiz
by rooquiz
Related Servers
Alternatives to RooQuiz
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to run and manage quizzes through natural language, including registering users, fetching questions, validating answers, and generating leaderboards, over both local stdio and remote HTTP connections.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents and users to run interactive, one-question-at-a-time quiz sessions over stdio or HTTP, backed optionally by a MySQL database. Exposes tools for registering users, fetching questions, validating answers, generating leaderboards, and reviewing responses.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables creating and administering multiple quizzes, adding questions, registering participants, validating answers, reviewing responses, and managing leaderboards through MCP, accessible locally via stdio or remotely over HTTP.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA quiz distribution and grading server for educators. Create exams, generate student links + QR codes, grade submissions, and track student performance — all from Claude.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGenerate styled QR codes, manage dynamic short links with click analytics, and publish micro-landing pages via AI agents.1935 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to build and operate production-ready forms, quizzes, surveys, and workflows, including creation, publishing, submission management, and integration with webhooks and analytics.MIT
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 52 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The toolset is organized by resource (forms, questions, translations, examinees, records, leads, bookings, tenants) and the descriptions are unusually precise, so most choices are clear. A few near-neighbor pairs remain (create_form / create_form_from_template / duplicate_form, update_form / update_form_settings, list_records / list_leads / list_examinees), but the documentation draws those boundaries well.
Naming Consistency4/5
Almost every tool follows a lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern, with clear CRUD families for forms, questions, translations, records, leads, and bookings. Minor inconsistencies such as add_question vs insert_question, set_dimension_analysis next to update_form, and update_tenant_slug beside switch_active_tenant keep it from a perfect score.
Tool Count1/5
At 52 tools, this crosses the 50+ threshold for an extreme tool surface and is far beyond the 3-15 sweet spot; the sheer volume will consume context and make reliable tool selection harder. The scope is genuinely broad, but a single MCP server this large is a mismatch and should be split into quiz-builder, analytics/CRM, and booking/team servers.
Completeness4/5
The core quiz lifecycle is thoroughly covered: form CRUD plus restore/duplicate, question editing, translations, media upload, delivery settings, analytics, submission records, leads, and bookings. Minor gaps exist - no media list/delete, no member removal, no examinee delete - but agents can work around them.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues