romaco_clear_alerts
Clear all price alerts from the chart to remove visual markers and reset the display.
Instructions
Remove all price alerts from the chart.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Clear all price alerts from the chart to remove visual markers and reset the display.
Remove all price alerts from the chart.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It conveys a destructive action (removing all alerts) with no mention of reversibility, confirmations, or side effects. Adequate but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is extremely concise and front-loaded. Every word is necessary; no waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless tool with no output schema, the description provides sufficient context: what it does and where. It could clarify if 'chart' refers to the current chart, but that is reasonably implied.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, so the description naturally covers all needed information. Baseline for zero parameters is 4, and the description adds value by specifying the action and scope.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Remove', the resource 'all price alerts', and the location 'from the chart'. It distinguishes well from sibling tools like romaco_add_alert and romaco_remove_alert by specifying the scope (all).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use the tool (to clear all alerts), but does not explicitly mention alternatives such as romaco_remove_alert for individual removal. No guidance on when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/romaco-labs/romaco-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server