romaco_add_alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions alerts are shown visually when triggered, but omits details like whether the alert is persistent, if it can be removed, or what happens on creation (e.g., success confirmation). This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise with two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and contains no redundant or irrelevant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description lacks important context such as return value, error conditions, or whether the chart must be initialized. It is insufficient for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior and outcomes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents parameters. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema, such as explaining the direction enum values or providing examples. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool adds a price alert on the chart and mentions triggered alerts are shown visually. It also references romaco_get_chart_context for viewing existing alerts, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like romaco_remove_alert and romaco_clear_alerts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description suggests using romaco_get_chart_context to see existing alerts, providing some context for use, but it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites (e.g., requires an active chart).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.