Skip to main content
Glama
romaco-labs

@romaco/mcp

Official
by romaco-labs

romaco_add_indicator

Add a technical indicator to a trading chart, such as EMA, RSI, MACD, or Bollinger Bands, with customizable parameters.

Instructions

Add a technical indicator to the chart. Examples: EMA with period 20, RSI with period 14, MACD with params [12, 26, 9], BOLL (Bollinger Bands) with period 20. Params are positional numbers specific to each indicator type.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
paramsNoPositional parameters. EMA/SMA: [period]. RSI: [period]. MACD: [short, long, signal]. BOLL: [period, multiplier]. KDJ: [period, k, d]. Omit to use defaults.
indicatorTypeYesIndicator type name. Common values: EMA, SMA, RSI, MACD, BOLL, KDJ, ATR, VOL, WR, BIAS, CCI, DMI, SAR, TRIX, MTM, EMV, ROC, PVT, OBV, CR, DMA, VR, BBI, AO, PSY, BRAR. Case-insensitive.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries burden. Offers parameter format guidance and default behavior, but does not disclose if adding an indicator is destructive, has limits, or requires authentication.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences with front-loaded purpose. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers indicator types, parameter formats, and defaults. Lacks error conditions or limits, but sufficient for typical usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value by providing examples per indicator type and noting default behavior ('Omit to use defaults'), going beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Add' and resource 'technical indicator' with target 'chart'. Examples distinguish it from sibling tools like add_alert or add_drawing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like romaco_get_indicator_values or romaco_remove_indicator. Lacks exclusionary context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/romaco-labs/romaco-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server