确认账号注册摘要

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions returning a summary and the need for confirmation, but does not specify side effects (e.g., whether confirmation triggers any state change), required preconditions (e.g., registration must be started), or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with only two sentences, each providing core information (return summary, confirmation requirement). However, it could be slightly restructured to include parameter details without increasing length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of output schema and annotations, and moderate complexity (2 params, one required), the description is insufficient. It does not explain what the summary contains, prerequisites (e.g., registration started), or handling of the confirm parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must clarify parameters. It partially implies flowId identifies the registration flow, but does not explicitly describe either parameter, especially the confirm boolean's meaning or default behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool returns a real-name registration summary and that user confirmation is required before submission. It distinguishes from sibling tools like register_submit and register_start by focusing on the summary and confirmation step.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for confirming registration, mentioning that confirmation is needed before submission. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when the registration flow is incomplete or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.