继续预约流程

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. The description mentions three possible actions (set_field, get_captcha, send_sms) but does not disclose side effects, authentication needs, or reversibility. For a tool with no annotations, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it lacks structure and fails to cover multiple actions and parameters adequately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain the workflow, prerequisites, or return values, leaving the agent without critical context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no explanation for parameters (field, value, flowId, action). It does not clarify what values are valid or how they relate to the actions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description indicates the tool provides a field or gets captcha/sends SMS for the appointment flow, but 'provide a field' is ambiguous. It does not distinguish from sibling tools like auth_get_captcha or auth_send_sms_code.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as auth_get_captcha or register_send_sms_code. The agent receives no hints about context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.