run_backup_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description carries the full burden. It only mentions that the task starts 'immediately', which is a minimal behavioral trait. It does not disclose whether the operation is destructive, requires permissions, or what the response entails.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and to the point, using two lines. The '[control]' tag is cryptic but not overly distracting. The structure is front-loaded with the action, then parameter details. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one parameter and an output schema is present, the description is nearly complete. It covers purpose and parameter context. However, it lacks explanation of any side effects or the output format beyond what schema provides.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage for parameters. The description adds that task_id is 'Numeric task id (from list_backup_tasks)', providing the source and data type. This significantly aids understanding. However, it lacks constraints like valid ranges or formatting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Start' and the resource 'Hyper Backup task', making the action unambiguous. It is distinct from sibling tools like 'list_backup_tasks' and 'run_scheduled_task' in its focus on immediate execution. However, it does not explicitly differentiate itself from 'run_scheduled_task' which might also trigger tasks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'list_backup_tasks' or 'run_scheduled_task'. The description does not include any context about prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.