Skip to main content
Glama
rafalr100

Synology MCP Server

by rafalr100

Related Servers

Alternatives to Synology MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to inspect Synology NAS system, storage, and utilization, and manage Docker containers via the Synology Web API with automatic session handling.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to manage and monitor Synology NAS via official DSM API, including file operations, system stats, backups, downloads, and camera lists.
      15
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a Synology NAS through the official DSM WebAPI, covering File Station, Download Station, Synology Photos, Container Manager, and system management with curated tools and a generic bridge for other APIs.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Synology NAS services including DSM, File Station, Calendar, Note Station, Contacts, Chat, Download Station, and Container Manager through a modular MCP interface with configurable safety modes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Synology NAS — modular, secure (2FA-ready), permission-tiered. File management and beyond.
      84 PyPI
      7
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 71 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with only minor overlaps like list_shared_folders vs list_shares and check_dsm_update vs install_dsm_update. Overall, an agent can reliably differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_system_info, list_files, create_folder). There are no mixing of conventions or ambiguous verb choices.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 71 tools, the server is overly large for a single MCP service. While each tool may be individually useful, the excessive count overwhelms the interface and suggests the server should be split into smaller, domain-specific servers.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of NAS management tasks including system info, storage, file operations, Docker, VMs, downloads, backup, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no user creation tool), but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues