create_shared_folder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention that creating a shared folder is destructive (overwrites?), requires specific permissions, or what happens if a folder with the same name exists. The '[control]' tag is unexplained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with no wasted words. The structure is clear: one sentence of purpose then an arg list. It could be slightly more structured, but it's efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not mention what the tool returns. It also lacks context about error conditions, naming conventions, or interaction with other tools like 'delete_shared_folder'. Given 3 parameters and sibling tools, the description feels incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description lists all three parameters with brief explanations, which adds value since the input schema has 0% description coverage. However, it lacks details like allowed characters for name, valid volume paths, or description length limits.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new shared folder.' This is a specific verb+resource combination that distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'create_folder' which would create a regular folder within a shared folder or elsewhere.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_folder', nor does it mention any prerequisites (e.g., volume must exist, permissions needed) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.