Skip to main content
Glama
puru991

Kundlit Vedic Astrology

Janam Kundali (Vedic birth chart)

get_janam_kundali
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a full Vedic birth chart with lagna, planetary positions, running dashas, and notable yogas based on birth date, time, and place. Perfect for a complete chart reading.

Instructions

Returns a full Vedic birth-chart (janam kundali) summary for one person from their birth date, time and place: the lagna (ascendant) with sign, nakshatra, pada and lord; all nine grahas with sidereal sign, house, nakshatra, pada, dignity and retrograde/combust flags; the currently running Vimshottari mahadasha and antardasha with end dates, omitted only for a chart cast at the present moment, where no dasha has yet elapsed; and the most notable classical yogas detected, with a count of how many were found in all. Use this when the user wants their whole chart read. Prefer the cheaper, narrower sibling when the question is narrow: get_birth_details for only nakshatra / moon sign / lagna, get_dasha_periods for the full dasha timetable, get_upapada_arudha for the Jaimini layer, get_transits for where the planets are RIGHT NOW rather than at birth. Read-only deterministic computation (Swiss Ephemeris, Lahiri ayanamsa, whole-sign houses); no writes, no auth. Rate limits are counted per server instance: at least 30 requests/min/IP on this endpoint, plus a shared engine budget of at least 60/min/IP across all birth-chart tools. Accuracy depends on birth-time precision.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
placeNoPlace as free text, "City, State, Country" -- e.g. "Jaipur, Rajasthan, India". Preferred input: it is geocoded to coordinates and an IANA timezone server-side, and any city worldwide works. Omit only if you pass latitude + longitude + timezone instead.
latitudeNoLatitude in decimal degrees, -90 to 90, north positive (Delhi = 28.6139). Use only when `place` is omitted, and then longitude and timezone are required too.
timezoneNoIANA timezone name, e.g. "Asia/Kolkata" or "America/New_York" (never an offset like "+05:30"). Required when latitude/longitude are used; ignored when `place` is given.
longitudeNoLongitude in decimal degrees, -180 to 180, east positive (Delhi = 77.2090). Use only when `place` is omitted.
birth_dateYesBirth date in the Gregorian calendar as YYYY-MM-DD, e.g. 1992-03-14. Years 1200-2400 only, and it must be a real calendar date (2023-02-29 is rejected).
birth_timeYesBirth time on the local clock at the birth place, HH:MM in 24-hour format (00:00-23:59), e.g. 06:45 or 18:20. Not UTC. Required and not defaulted: the ascendant moves about one degree every four minutes, so a guessed time gives a guessed chart.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description adds behavioural context beyond annotations: mentions deterministic computation, Swiss Ephemeris, rate limits, and accuracy dependency on birth-time precision. Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description reinforces and adds specifics without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is front-loaded with the main purpose and then details. It is comprehensive but not overly verbose; each sentence adds value. Could be slightly more concise, but structure is good.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description thoroughly explains the output contents (lagna, grahas, dasha, yogas) and notes omissions for present-moment charts. Also covers accuracy dependencies, making the tool's behavior well-understood.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter having a good description. The tool description does not add significant additional meaning beyond what is in the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool returns a full Vedic birth-chart summary for one person, listing specific elements (lagna, grahas, dasha, yogas). It also distinguishes from sibling tools by naming alternatives for narrower queries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use this when the user wants their whole chart read' and lists four alternative sibling tools with specific narrow scopes, providing clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/puru991/kundlit-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server