Skip to main content
Glama
puru991

Kundlit Vedic Astrology

Kaal Sarp dosha check

check_kaal_sarp
Read-onlyIdempotent

Determine if Kaal Sarp dosha is present in a birth chart, identifying the type and whether it is full or partial, with a plain explanation. Requires exact birth time.

Instructions

Returns a yes/no Kaal Sarp dosha verdict for ONE birth chart -- the condition where the seven classical grahas all fall on one side of the Rahu-Ketu axis -- plus which of the twelve named types it is (Anant, Kulik, Vasuki, Shankhpal and the rest), whether the hemming is full or partial, the houses involved, and a plain explanation of the finding. Use this for 'do I have kaal sarp dosh' questions. It is a different dosha from the Mars one (check_manglik) and from marriage-pair doshas (get_kundli_match); ask for each separately. Read-only deterministic computation (Swiss Ephemeris, Lahiri ayanamsa); no writes, no auth, at least 30 requests/min/IP per server instance, plus a shared engine budget of at least 60/min/IP across all engine-backed tools. Needs an exact birth time -- partial hemming can flip with a few minutes' error.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
placeNoPlace as free text, "City, State, Country" -- e.g. "Jaipur, Rajasthan, India". Preferred input: it is geocoded to coordinates and an IANA timezone server-side, and any city worldwide works. Omit only if you pass latitude + longitude + timezone instead.
latitudeNoLatitude in decimal degrees, -90 to 90, north positive (Delhi = 28.6139). Use only when `place` is omitted, and then longitude and timezone are required too.
timezoneNoIANA timezone name, e.g. "Asia/Kolkata" or "America/New_York" (never an offset like "+05:30"). Required when latitude/longitude are used; ignored when `place` is given.
longitudeNoLongitude in decimal degrees, -180 to 180, east positive (Delhi = 77.2090). Use only when `place` is omitted.
birth_dateYesBirth date in the Gregorian calendar as YYYY-MM-DD, e.g. 1992-03-14. Years 1200-2400 only, and it must be a real calendar date (2023-02-29 is rejected).
birth_timeYesBirth time on the local clock at the birth place, HH:MM in 24-hour format (00:00-23:59), e.g. 06:45 or 18:20. Not UTC. Required and not defaulted: the ascendant moves about one degree every four minutes, so a guessed time gives a guessed chart.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false), the description adds that it is a deterministic computation using Swiss Ephemeris and Lahiri ayanamsa, mentions no writes or auth, and specifies rate limits (30 requests/min/IP per server instance, plus shared engine budget of 60/min/IP). This adds significant behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single paragraph of dense but well-organized information. It is front-loaded with the main verdict and types, and covers usage, behavior, and constraints. A bit more structure (e.g., separate sentences for different aspects) could improve readability, but it is effective and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately explains what the tool returns (yes/no, type, hemming, houses, explanation). It covers computational details, rate limits, and the need for exact birth time. For a tool with 6 parameters and no output schema, this is complete and provides all necessary context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so the description doesn't need to add much, but it provides extra context: it notes that partial hemming can flip with time errors, and clarifies the coordinate/timezone alternative for the place parameter. This adds value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns a yes/no Kaal Sarp dosha verdict for one birth chart, plus the specific type, hemming status, houses involved, and a plain explanation. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like check_manglik and get_kundli_match by explicitly naming them as different doshas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this for do I have kaal sarp dosh questions' and provides clear guidance on when not to use it (for manglik or kundli match, use separate tools). It also warns that partial hemming can flip with a few minutes' error, emphasizing the need for exact birth time.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/puru991/kundlit-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server