Skip to main content
Glama
puru991

Kundlit Vedic Astrology

Manglik (Mangal dosha) check

check_manglik
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check if a person has Manglik dosha in their birth chart, including severity, trigger points, cancellations, and traditional remedies. Use for pre-marriage compatibility assessment.

Instructions

Returns a yes/no Manglik (Mangal / Mars dosha) verdict for ONE person's birth chart, with severity (none, mild, medium or high), which of the three classical reference points trigger it (Mars counted from the ascendant, from the Moon, from Venus), the classical cancellations that apply, and the traditional remedies for it. Use this for 'am I manglik / do I have mangal dosh' questions, and run it per person before a marriage discussion. It scores ONE chart -- for the two-chart compatibility score use get_kundli_match; for the Rahu-Ketu hemming dosha use check_kaal_sarp. Read-only deterministic computation (Swiss Ephemeris, Lahiri ayanamsa); no writes, no auth, at least 30 requests/min/IP per server instance, plus a shared engine budget of at least 60/min/IP across all engine-backed tools. Remedies are the classical prescriptions, reported as data and not as advice.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
placeNoPlace as free text, "City, State, Country" -- e.g. "Jaipur, Rajasthan, India". Preferred input: it is geocoded to coordinates and an IANA timezone server-side, and any city worldwide works. Omit only if you pass latitude + longitude + timezone instead.
latitudeNoLatitude in decimal degrees, -90 to 90, north positive (Delhi = 28.6139). Use only when `place` is omitted, and then longitude and timezone are required too.
timezoneNoIANA timezone name, e.g. "Asia/Kolkata" or "America/New_York" (never an offset like "+05:30"). Required when latitude/longitude are used; ignored when `place` is given.
longitudeNoLongitude in decimal degrees, -180 to 180, east positive (Delhi = 77.2090). Use only when `place` is omitted.
birth_dateYesBirth date in the Gregorian calendar as YYYY-MM-DD, e.g. 1992-03-14. Years 1200-2400 only, and it must be a real calendar date (2023-02-29 is rejected).
birth_timeYesBirth time on the local clock at the birth place, HH:MM in 24-hour format (00:00-23:59), e.g. 06:45 or 18:20. Not UTC. Required and not defaulted: the ascendant moves about one degree every four minutes, so a guessed time gives a guessed chart.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds 'Read-only deterministic computation', 'no writes, no auth', specific rate limits (30/min/IP per instance, 60/min/IP shared engine budget), and clarifies that remedies are 'reported as data not advice'. This extends well beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is fairly concise but covers all necessary aspects. It is front-loaded with the primary purpose, then includes usage guidance, sibling distinctions, and behavioral details. A few sentences could be trimmed, but overall it is well-organized and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description thoroughly explains what is returned (yes/no, severity levels, reference points, cancellations, remedies). It also covers input constraints (required fields, place vs. coordinates), rate limits, and engine budgets. It provides complete context for an agent to understand and use the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed descriptions for all 6 parameters. The tool description does not add new meaning beyond what the schema already provides; it only reiterates usage context. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the full burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'returns' and the specific resource 'Manglik verdict for ONE person's birth chart', listing all output components (yes/no, severity, reference points, cancellations, remedies). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_kundli_match and check_kaal_sarp, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use ('am I manglik' questions, before marriage discussion) and when not to (use get_kundli_match for two-chart compatibility, check_kaal_sarp for Rahu-Ketu dosha). Also provides rate limits and auth/engine constraints, giving clear guidance on appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/puru991/kundlit-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server