Skip to main content
Glama

create_task

Create tasks with YAML frontmatter, Jira-style IDs, dependencies, priorities, estimates, due dates, and tags. Execution order is determined by checking dependencies and priorities.

Instructions

Creates a new task with YAML frontmatter metadata. Uses Jira-like IDs (e.g., AUTH-001, API-042) for stable references. Supports dependencies, priorities, estimates, due dates, and tags. Agents can determine execution order by checking dependencies and priorities.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesThe title of the task (e.g., "Implement OAuth authentication", "Fix login bug").
projectYesProject/Epic identifier used in the task ID (e.g., "AUTH", "API", "FRONTEND"). Will be uppercased. The task ID will be {PROJECT}-{NNN}.
descriptionNoDetailed description of the task. Can include markdown formatting.
ownerNoWho is responsible for this task (e.g., "cursor", "john-doe", "backend-team").
priorityNoPriority level: "P0" (critical/blocker), "P1" (high), "P2" (medium/default), "P3" (low).P2
statusNoCurrent status: "todo" (not started), "in_progress" (being worked on), "blocked" (waiting on something), "review" (needs review), "done" (completed).todo
depends_onNoArray of task IDs this task depends on (e.g., ["AUTH-001", "AUTH-002"]). Task cannot start until dependencies are done.
blocked_byNoArray of task IDs or external blockers (e.g., ["AUTH-003", "waiting-on-api-key"]). Different from depends_on - these are blockers that prevent progress.
estimateNoTime estimate (e.g., "2h", "1d", "3d", "1w"). Use h=hours, d=days, w=weeks.
dueNoDue date in YYYY-MM-DD format (e.g., "2025-01-15").
tagsNoArray of tags for categorization (e.g., ["security", "urgent", "tech-debt", "feature"]).
subtasksNoArray of subtask descriptions. Will be rendered as a checklist in the task.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses the ID format and supported features (dependencies, priorities) but does not mention side effects, permissions, or whether creation triggers any indexing or notifications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is 4 sentences and front-loaded with the main purpose. It is reasonably concise, though a few words could be trimmed without loss of meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 12 parameters and no output schema, the description provides high-level capability overview but lacks details on return values or how the created task is represented. The mention of YAML frontmatter hints at output but is insufficient for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes all parameters. The description adds value by explaining Jira-like IDs and the fact that agents can use dependencies/priorities for execution order, but it does not deeply enhance parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'creates' and resource 'task', and distinguishes the tool from siblings like 'update_task', 'delete_task', etc., by specifying features like YAML frontmatter and Jira-like IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_or_update_todo' or 'import_tasks'. It mentions agents can use dependencies and priorities to determine execution order, providing some context but lacking clear exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pouyanafisi/project-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server