Version Pill MCPofficial
F
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceAI-native project management server for coding agents, offering 60 tools for tasks, releases, epics, cycles, docs, and ideas with caching and agent memory.
-
Project MCP
by pouyanafisi
Related Servers
Alternatives to Project MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with git-native persistent memory and a dependency-aware task graph, letting them record and fuzzy-recall architectural decisions, lessons, and gotchas while creating, claiming, and completing tasks that auto-unblock downstream work. Stores everything as plain JSON and Markdown committed inside the repository, so context stays branch-aware, team-shared, and reviewable in pull requests.0MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing comprehensive task management capabilities with support for project organization, task tracking, and automatic PRD parsing into actionable items.37MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn intelligent task management server that generates context-aware engineering plans using LLM-powered workflows and interactive requirement elicitation. It features persistent SQLite storage, category-based planning strategies, and automated progress tracking for software development projects.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local-first MCP server and CLI that gives coding agents structured project memory, task contracts, context packs, backlog workflows, and verification evidence, storing data in reviewable Markdown/YAML with a fast SQLite index.1-
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that turns project documentation and source code into durable, evidence-backed context for AI agents, with bounded retrieval and explicit gap reporting.8318 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 42 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes (e.g., create_task, archive_task, get_task). A few tools like manage_project_file vs specific create/update tools could cause minor confusion, but descriptions clarify their roles.
Naming Consistency4/5
Predominantly uses verb_noun pattern (create_task, get_task, delete_task). Some variations like add_ vs create_or_update_ and manage_project_file, but overall consistent and readable.
Tool Count4/5
42 tools is on the higher end, but each tool serves a distinct purpose in project management (CRUD for tasks, backlog, decisions, roadmap, etc.). Slightly over but reasonable given the comprehensive scope.
Completeness5/5
Covers full lifecycle for tasks, backlog, decisions, roadmap, status, documentation, and thoughts. Includes search, linting, and import/export features. No obvious gaps for project management.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues