A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server for clinical and pharmaceutical data, enabling search of ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, FDA, and ICH guidelines without API keys.
15 npm
MIT
aria-mcp-server
by pkotecha-eng
Related Servers
Alternatives to aria-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-quality MCP server that wraps the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API, providing structured, TTL-cached access to trial data worldwide and Turkey via 4 MCP tools.-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to the ClinicalTrials.gov API, enabling search, analysis, and retrieval of clinical trial data through MCP tools.178-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying PROSPERO registered protocols, enabling search, retrieval, and registration workflow management.ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to search ClinicalTrials.gov studies, retrieve full study records and posted results, discover valid fields and values, and match patient profiles to candidate recruiting trials through MCP over STDIO or Streamable HTTP.911 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server for clinical biomedical literature retrieval, enabling PubMed search, article metadata, full-text access, and evidence summarization through MCP-compatible clients.10MIT
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct data source: PubMed (literature), ClinicalTrials.gov (global trials), and ISRCTN (UK/European trials). The descriptions include specific use cases and overlap is minimal, so an agent can easily select the appropriate tool.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a clear 'search_<source>' pattern, making the naming perfectly consistent and predictable. The verb 'search' is used uniformly with the database name as the object.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools are appropriate for a search-focused server covering the key biomedical research databases. Each tool provides a distinct and essential capability without unnecessary bloat.
Completeness4/5
The server covers the main sources for biomedical literature and clinical trials, but lacks other registries (e.g., EU-CTR, WHO ICTRP). Minor gaps exist, but the core search workflows are well covered and agents can work around them.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessResponsive