gugik_prg_boundaries

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Describes that filter is applied as subset filter after loading, but fails to disclose side effects (e.g., network dependency, layer addition behavior) or failure modes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose. Could be more structured but is efficient and avoids verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema existing, return values need no explanation. Explains parameter usage, prerequisite (get_layer_schema), and filter syntax. Adequate for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage. Description adds meaning by listing level options, giving an example filter expression, and noting optional layer_name. Compensates well for schema gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'Add' and the specific resource 'Panstwowy Rejestr Granic (PRG) administrative boundaries as a WFS vector layer'. Distinguishes from siblings like wfs_add_layer and other gugik tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit instructions on level options, filter usage as QGIS expression, and recommends checking layer schema first. Lacks explicit alternatives for when not to use this tool over generic WFS.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.