dynamic_list_output

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the main action and result, but omits side effects, session/window requirements, the meaning of 'detected', or how include_text changes behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundancy. Every phrase contributes meaningful information, making it easy to scan and understand quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and minimal parameter documentation, the description is too thin for robust invocation. It gives the essential action but leaves parameter semantics, expected output structure, and behavioral side effects largely unspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across six parameters, and the description only loosely clarifies the button action and optional text inclusion. Parameters such as max_rows, max_columns, session_id, wait_seconds, and the expected value for button are left unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies a concrete action, pressing the dynamic list 'Вывести список' button, and the expected result: returning detected tabular document(s). It is clear about what the tool does but does not explicitly differentiate it from sibling tools such as tabular_documents or dynamic_list_current_settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, and no mention of conditions or exclusions. The phrase 'press dynamic list button' implies a workflow context, but the description does not help an agent decide between this and related dynamic list or tabular document tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.