dynamic_list_open_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description alone must disclose side effects and requirements. It reveals only that this is a UI action that opens a settings dialog through a labeled button; it says nothing about modal behavior, waiting for the dialog, failure conditions, or whether it requires an existing dynamic list. This leaves the agent without a meaningful behavioral model.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single compact sentence front-loads the action, resource, and the exact button label, with no filler. The parenthetical category list is useful and not redundant with the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations or output schema, the description omits essential operational context: how it fits into the dynamic-list workflow, what to pass in the parameters, and what the agent should observe after invocation. Although the core action is simple, an agent cannot reliably distinguish when to use it or what happens when called.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain either parameter. The label 'Настроить список' hints at what the button parameter might target, but session_id and the value format for button remain undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a concrete verb-resource pair, 'Open dynamic-list settings', and enumerates the setting categories (filter/order/conditional formatting/grouping), so its purpose is immediately clear. It does not explicitly contrast it with sibling tools like dynamic_list_set_settings or form_open_settings, though the 'Open' verb implies the distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description tells the mechanism ('via Настроить список') but gives no guidance about when to call this tool instead of related dynamic-list operations such as dynamic_list_current_settings, dynamic_list_set_settings, or form_open_settings. No prerequisites or exclusions are stated, so an agent must infer the correct context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.