dynamic_list_clear_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description must carry full behavioral disclosure. It states that filter/order/conditional formatting/grouping settings are cleared, but does not mention whether this is irreversible, whether it applies to the active dynamic list, or what side effects occur. For a destructive reset, this is a meaningful gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single focused sentence with the key operation front-loaded. The word 'Quickly' adds little, but it does not detract significantly from an otherwise compact definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple but destructive tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should clarify scope, required context, and the role of 'button'. The current text is too thin for an agent to call this tool confidently in a real dynamic-list workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain either parameter. 'button' is particularly ambiguous, and 'session_id' is left without context, so the agent cannot determine what values are valid or what each parameter controls.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific action ('reset/clear') and resource ('dynamic-list filter/order/conditional formatting/grouping settings'), which clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like dynamic_list_set_settings and dynamic_list_current_settings. There is no ambiguity about what operation is performed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus dynamic_list_set_settings, dynamic_list_open_settings, or dynamic_list_current_settings. It never states conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer context from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.