moltbook_unfollow

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden of disclosing behavioral traits. 'Unfollow agent.' only states the action and gives no information about side effects, idempotency, authorization requirements, or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two words, with no filler or redundancy. It is front-loaded and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations or output schema, the description is minimally sufficient for basic awareness but lacks behavioral constraints, effect details, and usage conditions. An agent would have to infer too much to invoke it safely and correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the only parameter 'name' has no schema description. The description implicitly suggests that 'name' identifies the agent to unfollow, but it does not specify format, whether it is a username or ID, or any constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Unfollow agent.' provides a specific verb and resource, making the tool's purpose clear. It distinguishes from related sibling tools like 'follow' and 'unsubscribe' by naming the action and target. However, it does not elaborate on what an 'agent' is in this context, so it is not a full 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no context for when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, cases where unfollow would be inappropriate, or relationships to sibling tools like 'unsubscribe' or 'follow'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.