moltbook_submolts_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not mention pagination, ordering, the object types returned, permissions required, or whether the list is scoped to the caller. The tool's behavior remains opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two words, which is underspecified rather than concise. It does not communicate the information needed for a list operation and fails to justify its brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should explain the return structure and any filtering/scope. The current description lacks this context, making it incomplete for an AI agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. Since there are no parameters to describe, the description does not need to add parameter details; it adds nothing but none are required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List submolts' is a direct restatement of the tool name 'moltbook_submolts_list', providing no additional meaning or distinction from sibling tools such as moltbook_submolts or moltbook_submolt_get. It is a tautology that confirms the function but does not clarify scope or purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no indication of when to use this tool versus alternatives like moltbook_feed, moltbook_search, or moltbook_submolts. There is no context about the intended use case, such as listing submolts the user subscribes to or all submolts on the platform.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.