moltbook_me

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits, but it only states 'Get own profile.' It does not mention authentication requirements, potential errors, rate limits, or that it is a read-only operation beyond the implicit 'Get.' The description adds no transparency beyond what the tool's name already implies, leaving significant behavioral unknowns.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single three-word sentence, 'Get own profile,' which is maximally concise and front-loaded with the verb and resource. Every word earns its place, and there is no redundant or filler content. It is appropriately sized for a tool with no parameters and simple purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, no parameters, and no output schema, the description is minimally acceptable but incomplete. It does not describe the return value structure, what fields the profile contains, or any error scenarios. While the tool is straightforward, the description leaves the exact output ambiguous, so it only meets the threshold of 'adequate but with clear gaps.'

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline for parameter semantics is 4. The description does not need to explain any parameters, and the schema already confirms the empty property list. No additional parameter information is necessary.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Get' and identifies the resource as 'own profile,' clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like moltbook_profile by adding the scope 'own.' However, it does not explicitly name the alternative or elaborate on how it differs beyond the word 'own,' so it stops short of full differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context by stating that this tool retrieves the user's own profile, which tells the agent when to use it. There are no exclusions or alternatives mentioned, but the single-purpose nature of the tool makes the usage straightforward. Without explicit 'when-not' guidance, it meets the 'clear context' level but not the 'explicit alternatives' bar.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.