get_organizations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states the tool retrieves organizations and respects a limit, but it fails to mention pagination behavior, error handling, idempotency, or the read-only nature. The lack of details beyond basic retrieval reduces transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a brief intro, clearly labeled arguments, return type, and examples. It is fairly concise, though the first two sentences are slightly redundant ('Get all organizations...' and 'Retrieves all organizations...'). Overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 optional parameters) and the presence of an output schema, the description covers the basics adequately. It explains parameters and provides usage examples. However, it lacks details on pagination behavior, error scenarios, and the exact structure of returned organizations, which would be needed for full completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0%, the description compensates well. It explains 'filter_id' as a saved filter ID and 'limit' as maximum results with a default of 500, and provides examples. This adds significant meaning beyond the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves all organizations from Pipedrive with details. It implies a list operation but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like get_organization (single) or search_organizations (full-text search). The examples reinforce the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use the tool (to get all organizations) and how to apply saved filters via filter_id. It references get_filters for available filters. However, it does not provide guidance on when not to use it or mention alternatives like get_organization for fetching a specific organization by ID.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.