Skip to main content
Glama
opendata-kr

narajangteo-prespec

by opendata-kr

사전규격 조회

search_prespecs
Read-only

Search pre-specifications from Korea's public procurement system by date range or registration number. Filter by procurement type and paginate results.

Instructions

사전규격을 기간(등록/변경일시) 또는 사전규격등록번호로 조회한다. 단순 기간·번호 조회에 쓴다. 기관 기준은 search_prespecs_by_institution, 품명 기준은 search_prespecs_by_product, 복합 조건은 search_prespecs_advanced를 쓴다. 업무구분 미지정 시 공사/용역/물품/외자를 병렬 조회한다. 데이터는 2025년 1월 이후 등록분이다.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kindNo업무구분: cnstwk=공사, servc=용역, thng=물품, frgcpt=외자. 미지정 시 전 구분 병렬 조회
pageNo페이지 번호(기본 1)
endDateNo조회 종료일 YYYYMMDD
dateTypeNo기간 기준: regist=등록일시(기본), change=변경일시
pageSizeNo페이지당 건수(기본 10)
startDateNo조회 시작일 YYYYMMDD
specRegistNoNo사전규격등록번호로 단건 조회(지정 시 기간보다 우선)
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint. Description adds that when kind is not specified, all categories are searched in parallel, and data is limited to after January 2025. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise with only essential sentences, front-loaded with purpose and usage guidance. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters and no output schema, description covers purpose, usage, behavioral details, and parameter defaults well. Lacks explicit output format but acceptable for a search tool with high schema coverage and annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds value by explaining default behavior for kind (parallel search when unspecified) and the data date limitation, which are not in schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool searches prespecs by date range or registration number, using specific verbs and resources. It also distinguishes from sibling tools by naming alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use this tool (simple date/number search) and when to use alternatives (by institution, by product, advanced search). Provides clear decision guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/opendata-kr/narajangteo-prespec-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server