narajangteo-prespec
Related Servers
Alternatives to narajangteo-prespec
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for searching Korean public procurement bid notices (나라장터) using natural language.10251 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Korean National Assembly Open API, enabling querying of bills, members, votes, committees, and more via natural language.2054 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Korean government power/energy statutory plans. Enables AI agents to search and retrieve public power plan documents.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching Japanese government procurement notices via the Kanpou API. Enables LLMs to search by date, keyword, or detailed criteria.31MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables searching Korean patents, trademarks, and designs via KIPRIS Plus open APIs. Supports keyword, advanced, applicant, and rightholder searches with detailed bibliographic lookup.769 npm61MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Korean National Law Information. Enables searching and retrieving Korean laws, English-translated laws, administrative rules, court precedents, and constitutional decisions via 54 MCP tools.54-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one for retrieving opinions on a specific prespec, and four search variants covering different criteria (basic, advanced, by institution, by product). Descriptions explicitly guide the agent on which tool to use, preventing ambiguity.
Four of five tools follow the 'search_prespecs_<modifier>' pattern, but 'get_prespec_opinions' uses a different verb and singular 'prespec' instead of plural 'prespecs'. This minor inconsistency could cause confusion but is still mostly predictable.
Five tools is well-scoped for the domain of pre-specifications: four search tools cover the main query patterns (date, institution, product, complex) and one retrieves opinions. No unnecessary duplication.
The set covers search and opinion retrieval, but lacks a tool to retrieve full details of a single prespec. Agents must rely on search results, which may not provide complete information. This is a notable gap.