manage_launch_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description conveys the mutation behavior beyond the destructiveHint annotation. It specifies return values (created/updated task object or confirmation) and notes failure conditions. This adds useful context for the agent, though it does not detail permissions or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured with clear sections (USE WHEN, Actions, Returns, FAILS WHEN). Every sentence is purposeful and provides essential information without redundancy. It is front-loaded with the main purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (9 parameters, no output schema), the description covers return values, failure conditions, and cross-tool references. It could mention that launch_id is always required, but overall it provides sufficient context for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 3. The description adds extra meaning by specifying parameter requirements per action (e.g., name+section_id for create, task_id for update/delete) and referencing external data sources for IDs. This clarifies parameter usage beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates, updates, or deletes launch tasks. It uses specific verbs (create, update, delete) and identifies the resource (launch task). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_launch_tasks, which are read-only.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes 'USE WHEN' examples and actions, providing clear context for when to use the tool. It also explains failure conditions and references other tools (get_launch_tasks, list_users) for obtaining required IDs, helping the agent decide when to use this tool versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.