Skip to main content
Glama
olgasafonova

productplan-mcp-server

by olgasafonova

get_launch_sections

Read-only

Get launch checklist sections and categories by launch ID. Use to show sections or list checklist categories for planning.

Instructions

Get checklist sections for a launch.

USE WHEN: "Show sections", "Checklist categories" For one specific section, use get_launch_section. FAILS WHEN: launch_id not found.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
launch_idYesLaunch ID

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe ProductPlan payload (object or array) returned by the API, passed through verbatim
summaryYesHuman-readable summary of the result (e.g. "Found 3 roadmaps")

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv6.0.0
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "The ProductPlan payload (object or array) returned by the API, passed through verbatim",
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "summary": {
      +      "description": "Human-readable summary of the result (e.g. \"Found 3 roadmaps\")",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "summary",
      +    "data"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observedv5.0.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already mark the tool as readOnlyHint=true; the description adds the behavioral disclosure that the call fails when launch_id is not found. This goes beyond the schema and annotations by warning the agent about a non-empty error case rather than assuming an empty result.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every line earns its place: the purpose, trigger phrases, alternative routing, and failure condition. It is compact, front-loaded, and contains no filler or redundant restatement of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter, read-only listing tool with an output schema and explicit alternative routing, the description covers what an agent needs: what to call it for, when to use it, when it makes sense to call the sibling, and the primary failure mode. Nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the only parameter, launch_id, is described as 'Launch ID'. The main description adds no new meaning beyond that, which is acceptable since the schema already fully documents the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Get checklist sections for a launch.' It explicitly distinguishes itself from get_launch_section by noting that the singular tool is for one specific section, so an agent can immediately tell the two apart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides explicit USE WHEN trigger phrases ('Show sections', 'Checklist categories'), names the alternative (get_launch_section), and states the condition under which it should be used instead. It also documents a failure condition, leaving little to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.