get_launch_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, so the tool is known as safe and idempotent. The description adds no additional behavioral context beyond the retrieval action. With annotations present, the description does not need to repeat them, but it also does not add extra details like permissions or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, with the main purpose in the first sentence and usage guidance in clear bullet points. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with 2 required parameters, no output schema, and sufficient annotations, the description covers purpose, usage, and failure condition. It could mention return type or format, but given low complexity, it is fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% as both parameters have descriptions in the schema. The description mentions 'by ID' and implies IDs are required via the FAILS WHEN condition, but adds no further semantics. Baseline 3 is appropriate since schema already covers parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Get a specific launch task by ID,' specifying the verb 'Get' and the resource 'launch task by ID.' It explicitly distinguishes from sibling tool 'get_launch_tasks' by noting usage for all tasks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit USE WHEN scenarios: 'Show one specific task by ID' and 'Check task assignment or status.' Also states FAILS WHEN condition for missing IDs, giving clear guidance on when to use and failure conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.