miro_create_sticky_grid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reveals a key behavioral trait: max 50 stickies. The VOICE-FRIENDLY example hints at the output format. However, with no annotations beyond title, it could disclose more about potential side effects or auth requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: only three sentences plus structured USE WHEN and VOICE-FRIENDLY sections. It is front-loaded with the core purpose and contains no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main purpose, usage guidelines, constraints, and an example output. With output schema existing, return values are covered. However, it omits details like grid layout behavior (e.g., row filling) and default parameter values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds little extra meaning beyond the schema, though the VOICE-FRIENDLY example indirectly references columns. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Create multiple sticky notes arranged in a grid layout (max 50).' It distinguishes itself from the sibling miro_bulk_create by advising 'For mixed item types, use miro_bulk_create.' The USE WHEN phrases further clarify the specific use case.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use scenarios via USE WHEN phrases and gives an alternative tool for mixed item types. While it doesn't mention miro_create_sticky, the grid layout implies it's for multiple items, and the max limit is stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.