get_space

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a read operation ('returns information'), but without annotations, it should provide more behavioral context such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. None of this is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence that is front-loaded and concise. It could be slightly more informative, but it earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema, the description should hint at what the returned information includes (e.g., space name, URL, settings). Without this, the description feels incomplete for an agent trying to understand the tool's output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description in the schema provides good semantics (optional organization name, referral to list_organizations). The tool description itself adds no additional meaning, so a baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool returns information about the Backlog space, which is a specific resource. However, it does not differentiate itself from sibling tools like get_space_activities, but the name conveys the core function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The parameter description hints at using list_organizations for organization inspection, but overall usage context is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.