Skip to main content
Glama

list_a2a_agents

Lists available Agent-to-Agent (A2A) agents for Langflow workflows. Requires server-side A2A enablement.

Instructions

List available A2A (Agent-to-Agent) agents (Langflow 1.11.0). Requires server-side A2A enablement (LANGFLOW_A2A_ENABLED).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description carries full burden. It notes the requirement for LANGFLOW_A2A_ENABLED, but does not disclose response format or that it is a read-only operation. Partial transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no waste. Efficiently conveys key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with no parameters and no output schema, description is mostly complete. Could hint at what the list contains (e.g., agent cards or just names), but still adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters and schema coverage 100%, so baseline 3 applies. Description does not need to add parameter info.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists available A2A agents, specifying a version and prerequisite. It implicitly distinguishes from sibling 'get_a2a_agent_card' by using 'list' vs 'get', but does not explicitly differentiate from 'invoke_a2a_jsonrpc'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: when you need to list A2A agents. It mentions a prerequisite (server-side enablement), but does not provide when-not-to-use or alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server