delete_traces
Delete all traces for a specific flow by providing its flow ID, helping maintain clean tracking data.
Instructions
Delete all traces associated with a flow.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| flow_id | Yes | Flow ID |
Delete all traces for a specific flow by providing its flow ID, helping maintain clean tracking data.
Delete all traces associated with a flow.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| flow_id | Yes | Flow ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must carry the full burden. It only states the action without disclosing side effects, irreversibility, permission requirements, or batch behavior. For a destructive bulk operation, more transparency is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence conveying the core purpose efficiently. However, it could be slightly more structured with additional details, but it is not verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate. It does not explain what traces are or the effect of deletion, but the sibling tools and context provide some implicit understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (flow_id described as 'Flow ID'). The description adds context ('associated with a flow') but does not provide additional semantics beyond the parameter name and schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool deletes all traces for a flow. It uses a specific verb ('Delete') and resource ('all traces'), and the scope ('associated with a flow') distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'delete_trace' which deletes a single trace.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'delete_trace' or other related tools. Does not specify prerequisites or conditions for use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server